A neuron in opposition to deep studying in duplicate prediction
DeVries, P.M. H., Viégas, F., Wattenberg, M. & Meade, B.J. To be taught in depth the patterns of aftershocks following necessary earthquakes. Nature 560, 632-634 (2018).
Meade, B.J., DeVries, P., R., Faller, J., Viegas, F. and Wattenberg, M. What is best than stress as a result of Coulomb failure? Classification of set off mechanisms for scalar static constraints from 105 pairs of most important shocks. Geophysics Res. Lett. 44, 11 409-11 416 (2017).
Reasenberg, P. A. and Jones, L. M. Threat of earthquake after a serious shock in California. Science 243, 1173-1176 (1989).
Reasenberg, P.A. & Jones, L.M. Following the earthquake: replace. Science 265, 1251-1252 (1994).
Gerstenberger, M.C., Wiemer, S., Jones, L.M. & Reasenberg, PA Actual-time prediction of the earthquakes of tomorrow in California. Nature 435, 328-331 (2005).
Felzer, Okay.R. & Brodsky, E.E. The decay of the density of aftershocks with distance signifies the triggering by dynamic stress. Nature 441, 735-738 (2006).
Richards-Dinger, Okay., R., S., and Toda, S. Decay in replicate density by distance doesn’t point out triggering by dynamic stress. Nature 467, 583-586 (2010).
Mignan, A. Utsu, the posterior duplicate productiveness legislation was defined from geometric operations on the everlasting static stress subject of main shocks. Nonlinear course of. Geophysics 25, 241-250 (2018).
Steacy, S., Gerstenberger, M., Williams, C., Rhoades, D. and Christophersen, A. A brand new hybrid Coulomb / statistical mannequin for predicting replication charges. Geophysics J. Int. 196, 918-923 (2014).
Cattania, C., Hainzl, S., Wang, L., Roth, F. and Enescu, B. Propagation of Coulomb stress uncertainties in physics-based replication fashions. J. Geophys. Res. Strong Earth 119, 7846-7864 (2014).
Cattania, C. et al. Predictive competence of physics-based seismicity fashions in the course of the 2010-2012 seismic sequence in Canterbury, New Zealand. Seismol. Res. Lett. 89, 1238-1250 (2018).
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y. and Hinton, G. Deep Studying. Nature 521, 436-444 (2015).
Jordan, M. I. & Mitchell, T. M. Machine Studying: Traits, Views and Prospects. Science 349, 255-260 (2015).
Kong, Q. et al. Automated studying in seismology: remodeling information into concepts. Seismol. Res. Lett. 90, Three-14 (2019).
Beroza, G. C. Predictions of aerial replication flip to AI. Nature 560, 556-557 (2018).