Social dilemmas among the many unequal
Trivers, R. L. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35-57 (1971).
Axelrod, R. The evolution of cooperation (Fundamental Books, 1984).
Sigmund, Okay. The calculation of selfishness (Princeton Univ Press, 2010).
Nowak, Mr. A. 5 guidelines for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314, 1560-1563 (2006).
Piketty, T. & Saez, E. Lengthy-term inequality. Science 344, 838-843 (2014).
Scheffer, M., van Bavel, B., van de Leemput, I.A. & van Nes, E.H. Inequality in nature and society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 13154-13157 (2017).
Cherry, T. L., Kroll, S. and Shogren, J. F. Affect of Heterogeneity and Origin of Endowment Funds on Contributions of Public Good: Laboratory Knowledge. J. Econ. Habits Physique. 57, 357-365 (2005).
Hargreaves Heap, S.P., Ramalingam, A. and Stoddard, B. Inequality of endowment funds in public good video games: a assessment. Econ. Lett. 146, Four-7 (2016).
Nishi, A., H. Shirado, Rand, D. G. and Christakis, N. A. Inequality and visibility of wealth in experimental social networks. Nature 526, 426-429 (2015).
Hauser, O. P., Kraft-Todd, G.T., Rand, D.G., Nowak, M.A. and Norton, M. I. Invisible inequality results in punishing the poor and rewarding the wealthy. Habits Public Coverage https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.Four (2019).
Nowak, M. and Sigmund, Okay. A win-win-lose answer that outperforms the attacker within the prisoner's dilemma. Nature 364, 56-58 (1993).
Szabó, G., Antal, T., Szabó, P. & Droz, M. The dilemma of the spatial evolutionary prisoner with three exterior methods and constraints. Phys. Rev. E 62, 1095-1103 (2000).
Doebeli, M. & Hauert, C. Fashions of cooperation primarily based on the prisoner's dilemma and the sport of blown snow. College. Lett. eight, 748-766 (2005).
Stewart, A.J. & Plotkin, J. B. From extortion to generosity, the evolution of the iterated prisoner dilemma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 15348-15353 (2013).
van Veelen, M., García, J., Rand, D. G. and Nowak, M. A. Direct reciprocity in structured populations. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 9929-9934 (2012).
Kerr, B., Godfrey-Smith, P. and Feldman, M. W. What’s Altruism? Developments Ecol. Evol. 19, 135-140 (2004).
Rand, D. G. & Nowak, M. A. Human cooperation. Developments Cogn. Sci. 17, 413-425 (2013).
Frank, M. R. et al. Detect reciprocity on a world scale. Sci. Adv. Four, eaao5348 (2018).
Gächter, S., Mengel, F., Tsakas, E. and Vostroknutov, A. Development and inequality within the provision of public items. J. Public Econ. 150, 1-13 (2017).
Pinheiro, F.L., Vasconcelos, V.V., Santos, F.C. & Pacheco, J.M. Evolution of all or nothing methods in dilemmas of repeated public items. PLOS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003945 (2014).
Fudenberg, D. & Tirole, J. Sport Idea, sixth version (MIT Press, 1998).
Fisher, J., Isaac, R.M., Schatzberg, J.W. & Walker, J.M. Heterogeneous Demand for Public Items: Habits within the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism. Public Selection 85, 249-266 (1995).
van Gerwen, N., Buskens, V. and van der Lippe, T. Particular person coaching and cooperative conduct of staff: outcomes of a contextualized laboratory experiment. Rationality Soc. 30, 432-462 (2018).
Reuben, E. & Riedl, A. Software of contribution requirements in public good video games with heterogeneous populations. Econ Video games. Habits 77, 122-137 (2013).
Abdallah, S. et al. Corruption results in the emergence of civil society. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20131044 (2014).
Muthukrishna, M., Francis, P., Pourahmadi, S. and Henrich, J. Corrosion of cooperation and results of anti-corruption methods on the surroundings. Nat. Hum. Habits 1 0138 (2017).
Tricomi, E., Rangel, A., Camerer, C.F. & O'Doherty, J.P. Neuronal proof of social preferences versus inequality. Nature 463, 1089-1091 (2010).
Dawes, C.T., Fowler, J.H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R. & Smirnov, O. Egalitarian Patterns in Man. Nature 446, 794-796 (2007).
Durante, R., Putterman, L. and Van der Weele, J. Preferences for the redistribution and notion of fairness: an experimental research. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 12, 1059-1086 (2014).
Tavoni, A., Dannenberg, A., Kallis, G. and Löschel, A. Inequality, communication and prevention of disastrous local weather change within the recreation of public items. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 11825-11829 (2011).
Milinski, M., Sommerfeld, R., D., Krambeck, H.-J., Reed, F. and Marotzke J. The social dilemma at collective threat and the prevention of a simulated harmful local weather change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2291-2294 (2008).
Pacheco, J.M., Santos, F.C., Souza, M.O. & Skyrms, B. Evolutionary Dynamics of Collective Motion in Deer Searching Dilemmas at N Individuals. Proc. R. Soc. B 276, 315-321 (2009).
Jacquet, J. et al. Intra and intergenerational updating within the local weather recreation. Nat. Clim. Change three, 1025-1028 (2013).
Vasconcelos, V.V., Santos, F.C. and Pacheco, J.M. A bottom-up institutional method to the cooperative governance of dangerous commons. Nat. Clim. Change three, 797-801 (2013).
Archetti, M. & Scheuring, I. Assessment: the speculation of the video games of public items in social dilemmas at a blow with out assortment. J. Theor. Biol. 299, 9-20 (2012).
Milinski, M., Röhl, T. and Marotzke, J. The cooperative interplay between wealthy and poor might be catalyzed by intermediate local weather targets. Clim. Change 109, 807-814 (2011).
Vasconcelos, V.V., Santos, F.C., Pacheco, J.M. and Levin, S. A. Local weather insurance policies below inequality of wealth. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2212-22216 (2014).
Abou Chakra, M. & Traulsen, A. Below an necessary subject and in uncertainty, the wealthy ought to give a hand to the poor. J. Theor. Biol. 341, 123-130 (2014).
Abu Chakra, M., Bumann, S., H. Schenk, A. Oschlies, and A. Traulsen, A. Fast motion is the perfect technique for coping with unsure local weather change. Nat. Widespread. 9, 2566 (2018).
Hauser, O.P., Traulsen, A. and Nowak, M.A.The heterogeneity of the bodily type of the background acts as a suppressor of choice. J. Theor. Biol. 343, 178-185 (2014).
Akin, E. What it’s essential to know to play nicely within the iterated prisoner dilemma. Video games 6, 175-190 (2015).
Nowak, M.A. & Sigmund, Okay. Tit for heterogeneous populations. Nature 355, 250-253 (1992).
Frean, M. R. The prisoner's dilemma with out synchronism. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B257, 75-79 (1994).
Killingback, T., Doebeli, M. and Knowlton, N. Variable funding, the prisoner's dilemma continues and the origin of cooperation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266, 1723-1728 (1999).
Imhof, L. A. and Nowak, M. A. Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of direct reciprocity. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 463-468 (2010).
Kurokawa, S., Wakano, J. Y. and Ihara, Y. Beneficiant co-operators can outperform non-generous co-operators by changing a inhabitants of defectors. Theor. Popul. Biol. 77, 257-262 (2010).
García, J. & Traulsen, A. The construction of mutations and the evolution of cooperation. PLoS ONE 7, e35287 (2012).
Grujić, J., Cuesta, J. A. and Sánchez, A. Concerning the coexistence of cooperators, defectors and conditional co-operators within the iterative multiplayer of the prisoner's dilemma. J. Theor. Biol. 300, 299-308 (2012).
Press, W.H. & Dyson, F.JIterated The prisoner's dilemma comprises methods that dominate any adversary of evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 10409-10413 (2012).
Van Segbroeck, S., Pacheco, J.M., Lenaerts, T. and Santos, F.C. Emergence of fairness in repeated group interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 158104 (2012).
Akin, E. in Ergodic Idea, Advances in Dynamics (Assani, I.) 77-107 (de Gruyter, Berlin, 2016).
Stewart, A.J. & Plotkin, J.B. Collapse of cooperation in evolving video games. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 17558-17563 (2014).
Stewart, A.J. & Plotkin, J.B. The scalability of cooperation within the context of native and non-local adjustments. Video games 6, 231-250 (2015).
Szolnoki, A. & Perc, M. Defection and extortion are surprising catalysts of unconditional cooperation in structured populations. Sci. Rep. Four, 5496 (2014).
Toupo, D.F.P., Rand, D.G. & Strogatz, S.H. Restrict cycles brought on by a mutation of the prisoner's repeated dilemma. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 24, 1430035 (2014).
Dong, Y., Li, C., Tao, Y. and Zhang, B. Evolution of conformity in social dilemmas. PLoS ONE 10, e0137435 (2015).
Pan, L., Hao, D., Rong, Z. and Zhou, T. Zero willpower methods within the recreation of iterated public items. Sci. Rep. 5, 13096 (2015).
Baek, S.Okay., Jeong, H.C., Hilbe, C. & Nowak, M.A. Comparability of reactive and reminiscence direct reciprocity methods. Sci. Rep. 6, 25676 (2016).
McAvoy, A. & Hauert, C. Autocratic methods for iterated video games with arbitrary areas of motion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 3573-3578 (2016).
Reiter, J. G., Hilbe, C., Rand, D.G., Chatterjee, Okay. and Nowak, M. A. Crosstalk in repeated video games hampers direct reciprocity and requires greater ranges of forgiveness. Nat. Widespread. 9, 555 (2018).
Ichinose, G. & Masuda, N. Zero willpower methods in finely repeated video games. J. Theor. Biol. 438, 61-77 (2018).
Hilbe, C., Chatterjee, Okay. and Nowak, M. A. Companions and rivals in direct reciprocity. Nat. Hum. Habits 2, 469-477 (2018).
Hilbe, C., Šimsa, Š., Chatterjee, Okay. & Nowak, M. A. Evolution of cooperation in stochastic video games. Nature 559, 246-249 (2018).
García, J. and van Veelen, M. In equilibrium and out of stability I: evolution of methods in repeated video games with actualization. J. Econ. Idea 161, 161-189 (2016).
García, J. & van Veelen, M. No technique can win within the repeated prisoner's dilemma: linking recreation idea and pc simulations. Entrance. Robotic. AI 5,102 (2018).
Hendriks, A. SoPHIE – Software program platform for human interplay experiments. https://www.sophie.uni-osnabrueck.de/begin/ (2012).
Hauser, O. P., Hendriks, A., Rand, D.G. and Nowak, M. A. Considering globally, performing domestically: preserving international commons. Sci. Rep. 6, 36079 (2016).