m6A improves the section separation potential of mRNA
Perry, R. P. & Kelley, D. E. Existence of methylated messenger RNA in mouse L cells. Cell 1, 37-42 (1974).
Desrosiers, R., Friderici, Okay. & Rottman, F. Identification of methylated nucleosides in messenger RNA from Novikoff hepatoma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 71, 3971-3975 (1974).
Meyer, Okay.D. & Jaffrey, S.R. Rethink m6A readers, writers and erasers. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33, 319-342 (2017).
Patil, D.P., Pickering, B.F. and Jaffrey, S.R. Studying m6A within the transcriptome: m6A binding proteins. Tendencies Cell Biol. 28, 113-127 (2018).
Nott, T.J. et al. The section transition of a disordered cloud protein generates organelles and not using a membrane, delicate to the surroundings. Mol. Cell 57, 936-94 (2015).
Lin, Y., Protter, D.S., Rosen, M.Okay. & Parker, R. Formation and maturation of liquid droplets separated in phases by RNA binding proteins. Mol. Cell 60, 208-219 (2015).
Quiroz, F.G. & Chilkoti, A. Sequence heuristics for encoding section conduct in intrinsically disordered protein polymers. Nat. Mater. 14, 1164-1171 (2015).
Wiśniewski, J.R., Hein, M., Y., Cox, J. and Mann, M. A "proteomic rule" for estimating protein copy quantity and protein focus with out rising requirements. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 13, 3497-3506 (2014).
Shin, Y. & Brangwynne, C.P. Liquid section condensation in cell physiology and illness. Science 357, ea4382 (2017).
Molliex, A. et al. Part separation by low complexity domains promotes the meeting of stress granules and results in pathological fibrillation. Cell 163, 123-133 (2015).
Kroschwald, S. et al. Promiscuous interactions and disaggregated proteins decide the bodily state of the stress-inducible RNP granules. eLife four, e06807 (2015).
Standart, N. & Weil, D. Physique P: Cytosolic droplets for coordinated storage of mRNA. Genet Tendencies. 34, 612-626 (2018).
Zhou, J. et al. Dynamic methylation of m6A mRNA directs translational management of warmth shock response. Nature 526, 591-594 (2015).
Dominissini, D. et al. Topology of human and mouse m6A mRNA methylomes revealed by m6A-seq. Nature 485, 201-206 (2012).
Meyer, Okay.D. et al. 5 U UTR m6A promotes unbiased translation of the cap. Cell 163, 999-1010 (2015).
Anders, M. et al. The dynamic methylation of m6A facilitates the sorting of mRNA to emphasize the granules. Life Sci. Alliance 1, e201800113 (2018).
Slobodin, B., Han, R., Calderone, V., Vrielink, JA, F. Loayza-Puch, F., Elkon, R. and Agami, R. Transcription has an influence on the effectiveness of the interpretation of mRNA via transcriptional N transcription.
Methylation of 6-adenosine. Cell 169, 326-337.e312 (2017).
Knuckles, P. et al. Dedication of the destiny of RNA by methylation of cotranscriptional adenosine and binding to the microprocessor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24, 561-569 (2017).
Wang, P., Doxtader, Okay. A. and Nam, Y. Structural foundation for the cooperative perform of methyltransferases Mettl3 and Mettl14. Mol. Cell 63, 306-317 (2016).
Wang, X. et al. Structural foundation of N
Methylation of 6-adenosine by the complicated METTL3 – METTL14. Nature 534, 575-578 (2016).
Śledź, P. & Jinek, M. Structural Overview of the Molecular Mechanism of the m6A Writing Complicated. eLife 5, e18434 (2016).
Han, T. W. et al. Cell-free formation of RNA granules: certain RNAs determine the traits and parts of cell assemblies. Cell 149, 768-779 (2012).
Khong, A., Matheny T., Jain S., Mitchell SF, JR Wheeler and R. Parker, R. The stress granule transcriptome reveals the ideas of the buildup of mRNA in stress granules . Mol. Cell 68, 808-820.e805 (2017).
Namkoong, S., Ho, A., Woo, Y.M., Kwak, H. and Lee, J.H. Systematic characterization of stress-induced RNA granulation. Mol. Cell 70, 175-187.e178 (2018).
Wang, X. et al. NOT
6-Methyladenosine-dependent regulation of the soundness of messenger RNA. Nature 505, 117-120 (2014).
Mouth, G., Amalric, F., Caizergues-Ferrer, M. and Zalta, J. P. Results of warmth shock on gene expression and distribution of subcellular proteins in Chinese language hamster ovary cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 7, 1739-1747 (1979).
Van Treeck, B. and Parker, R. New roles for intermolecular RNA – RNA interactions in RNP assemblies. Cell 174, 791-802 (2018).
Meyer, Okay.D. et al. A complete evaluation of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in three μ UTR and in shut codons. Cell 149, 1635-1646 (2012).
Kedersha, N. et al. Stress granules and therapy our bodies are dynamically linked websites of mRNP reworking. J. Cell Biol. 169, 871-884 (2005).
Zhu, T. et al. YTHDF2 YTH Area Crystal Construction Reveals N-recognition Mechanism
6-methyladenosine. Cell Res. 24, 1493-1496 (2014).
Xiang, Y. et al. Methylation of m6A RNA regulates the response to ultraviolet-induced DNA injury. Nature 543, 573-576 (2017).
Geula, S. et al. The methylation of m6A mRNA facilitates the decision of a naive pluripotency in direction of differentiation. Science 347, 1002-1006 (2015).
Knuckles, P. et al. Zc3h13 / Flacc is required for the methylation of adenosine by bridging between the Rbm15 / Spenito mRNA binding issue and the m6A Wtap / Fl (2) d equipment element. Genes Dev. 32, 415-429 (2018).
Wen, J. et al. Zc3h13 regulates the methylation of m6A nuclear RNA and the self-renewal of mouse embryonic stem cells. Mol. Cell 69, 1028-1038.e1026 (2018).
Patil, D.P. et al. Methylation of m6A RNA promotes transcriptional repression mediated by XIST. Nature 537, 369-373 (2016).
Xu, C. et al. Structural foundation of the discriminant recognition of N
6-methyladenosine RNA by the household of proteins of human YT521-B homology area. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 24902-24913 (2015).
Zhang, H. et al. RNA controls the section transitions of the polyQ protein. Mol. Cell 60, 220-230 (2015).
Zhong, S. et al. MTA is a messenger RNA adenosine methylase of Arabidopsis and interacts with a homologue of a sex-specific splice issue. Plant Cell 20, 1278-1288 (2008).
Hoover, D.M. & Lubkowski, J. DNAWorks: An Automated Technique for Designing Oligonucleotides for PCR-based Gene Synthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e43 (2002).
Li, H. et al. Design and specificity of long-dsDNA donors for CRISPR-based inoculation. Preprint on https://www.biorxiv.org/content material/10.1101/178905v1 (2017).
Linder, B. et al. Mononucleotide decision mapping of m6A and m6Am throughout the transcriptome. Nat. Strategies 12, 767-772 (2015).
Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultra-fast common aligner of ARN-seq. Bioinformatics 29, 15-21 (2013).
McGlincy, N.J. & Ingolia, N. T. Measurement of transcriptome scale translation by ribosome profiling. Strategies 126, 112-129 (2017).
Xiao, Z., Zou, Q., Liu, Y. and Yang, X. Genome Scale Analysis of Differential Translations Utilizing Ribosome Profiling Information. Nat. Widespread. 7, 11194 (2016).
Mi, H. et al. PANTHER model 7: Improved phylogenetic bushes, orthologs and collaboration with the Gene Ontology Consortium. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D204 to D210 (2010).
Lancaster, A. Okay., A. Nutter-Upham, Lindquist A., and King S., O. D. PLAAC: An online-based and command-line software for figuring out proteins with a prion-like amino acid composition. Bioinformatics 30, 2501-2502 (2014).
Gilles, F., D. Santos, M., Boudier, T., Bolte, S., and Heck, N. DiAna, an ImageJ instrument for 3D co-location and distance evaluation primarily based on knowledge. ;objects. Strategies 115, 55-64 (2017).
Hubstenberger, A. et al. Purification by P physique reveals the condensation of repressed mRNA regulons. Mol. Cell 68, 144-157.e145 (2017).
Jain, S. et al. The stress granules modulated by ATPase include a diverse proteome and substructure. Cell 164, 487-498 (2016).
Youn, J. Y. et al. Excessive density proximity mapping reveals the subcellular group of granules and our bodies related to mRNA. Mol. Cell 69, 517-532.e511 (2018).
Markmiller, S. et al. Variety of protein interactions in stress granules, relying on the context and particular to the illness. Cell 172, 590-604.e513 (2018).
Tsherniak, A. et al. Outline a most cancers habit card. Cell 170, 564-576.e516 (2017).