Nature News

Distinct Structural Courses of Activation of FOXA1 Alterations in Superior Prostate Most cancers

1.

Gao, N. et al. Forkhead Field A1 regulates ductal morphogenesis of the prostate and promotes maturation of epithelial cells. Improvement 132, 3431-3443 (2005).

2

Friedman, J. R. and Kaestner, Ok. H. The Foxa household of transcription elements for growth and metabolism. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63, 2317-2328 (2006).

Three

Analysis Community of the Atlas of the Most cancers Genome. Full molecular characterization of carcinoma of the urothelial bladder. Nature 507, 315-322 (2014).

Four

Robinson, D. et al. Integrative medical genomics of superior prostate most cancers. Cell 161, 1215-1228 (2015).

5

Analysis Community of the Atlas of the Most cancers Genome. Molecular taxonomy of main prostate most cancers. Cell 163, 1011-1025 (2015).

6

Ciriello, G. et al. Full molecular portraits of invasive lobular breast most cancers. Cell 163, 506-519 (2015).

7.

Dalin, M.G. et al. Complete molecular characterization of salivary carcinoma reveals exploitable targets and similarity to apocrine breast most cancers. Clin. Most cancers Res. 22, 4623-4633 (2016).

eight

Zehir, A. et al. The mutational panorama of metastatic most cancers revealed by the potential medical sequencing of 10,000 sufferers. Nat. Med. 23, 703-713 (2017).

9

Jin, H.-J., Zhao, J.C., Ogden, I., Bergan, R.C. and Yu, J. FoxA1 unbiased androgenic receptor perform in prostate most cancers metastasis. Most cancers Res. 73, 3725-3736 (2013).

ten.

Jin, H.-J., Zhao, J.C., Wu, L., Kim, J. and Yu, J. Cooperativity and equilibrium with FOXAl outline the transcription program of androgen receptors. Nat. Frequent. 5 3972 (2014).

11

Track, B. et al. Focusing on FOXA1-mediated repression of TGF-β signaling suppresses the development of castration-resistant prostate most cancers. J. Clin. Make investments. 129, 156-582 (2019).

12

Robinson, J. L. L. et al. The transcription of androgen receptors in apocrine molecular breast most cancers is mediated by FoxA1. EMBO J. 30, 3019-3027 (2011).

13

Robinson, J. L. L. et al. Excessive ranges of FOXA1 facilitate the binding of chromatin to the androgen receptor, giving a phenotype much like that of CRPC. Oncogene 33, 5666-5674 (2014).

14

Pomerantz, M. M. et al. The androgen receptor cistrome is essentially reprogrammed in human prostate tumorigenesis. Nat. Broom. 47, 1346-1351 (2015).

15

Cirillo, L.A. et al. Opening of chromatin compacted by transcription elements HNF3 (FoxA) and GATA-Four at first of growth. Mol. Cell 9, 279-289 (2002).

16

Iwafuchi-Doi, M. et al. The pioneering FoxA transcription issue maintains an accessible nucleosome configuration on the activator degree for the activation of the tissue-specific gene. Mol. Cell 62, 79-91 (2016).

17

Lupien, M. et al. FoxA1 interprets epigenetic signatures into lineage and amplifier particular transcription. Cell 132, 958-970 (2008).

18

Barbieri, C.E. et al. Exome sequencing identifies the recurrent mutations of SPOP, FOXA1, and MED12 in prostate most cancers. Nat. Broom. 44, 685-689 (2012).

19

Yang, Y.A. and Yu, J. Present views on FOXA1 regulation of androgen receptor signaling and prostate most cancers. Genesis Dis. 2, 144-151 (2015).

20

Grasso, C.S. et al. The mutational panorama of death-resistant prostate most cancers immune to castration. Nature 487, 239-243 (2012).

21

Gao, J. et al. 3D clusters of somatic mutations in most cancers reveal many uncommon mutations as practical targets. Genome Med. 9, Four (2017).

22

Clark, Ok.L., Halay, E.D., Lai, E. & Burley, S.Ok. The co-crystalline construction of the HNF-Three DNA recognition motif / fork head resembles the H5 histone. Nature 364, 412-420 (1993).

23

Li, J. et al. Forkhead area construction of FOXA2 linked to a full consensus DNA website. Biochemistry 56, 3745-3753 (2017).

24

Sekiya, T., Muthurajan, U., Luger, Ok., Tulin, A. V., and Zaret, Ok. S. Nucleosome binding affinity as the first determinant of nuclear mobility of the pioneering FoxA transcription issue. Genes Dev. 23, 804-809 (2009).

25

Wang, Z. et al. BART: A transcription issue prediction instrument with question gene units or epigenomic profiles. Bioinformatics 34, 2867-2869 (2018).

26

Behrens, J. et al. Practical interplay of β-catenin with the transcription issue LEF-1. Nature 382, ​​638-642 (1996).

27

Daniels, D.L. and Weis, W.I. β-Catenin immediately displaces Tcf / Lef Groucho / TLE repressors in Wnt-mediated transcriptional activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 12, 364-371 (2005).

28

Wang, W., Zhong, J., Su, B., Zhou, Y. and Wang, Y.-Q. The comparability of the Pax1 / 9 locus reveals a syntenic block of 500 Myr and non-coding areas conserved throughout evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol. 24, 784-791 (2007).

29

Tomlins, S.A. et al. Separate lessons of chromosomal rearrangements create fusions of oncogenic ETS genes in prostate most cancers. Nature 448, 595-599 (2007).

30

Annala, M. et al. Recurrent rearrangements of SKIL activation in prostate most cancers ETS detrimental. Oncotarget 6, 6235-6250 (2015).

31.

Shalem, O. et al. Screening CRISPR – Cas9 on the genome scale in human cells. Science 343, 84-87 (2014).

32

Phair, R.D. et al. International nature of dynamic protein-chromatin interactions in vivo: three-dimensional evaluation of the genome and networks of dynamic interplay of chromatin proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 6393-6402 (2004).

33

Grimm, J.B. et al. Normal methodology of fluorophore enhancement for dwelling cell microscopy and single molecule. Nat. Strategies 12, 244-250 (2015).

34

Pitchiaya, S. et al. The dynamic recruitment of easy RNA into therapy our bodies relies on the performance of the RNA. Mol. Cell 74, 521-533 (2019).

35

Swinstead, E.E. et al. Steroid receptors reprogram FoxA1's occupancy by dynamic chromatin transitions. Cell 165, 593-605 (2016).

36

Pitchiaya, S., Androsavich, J.R. & Walter, N. G. Single-molecule intracellular microscopy reveals two kinetically distinct pathways for microRNA meeting. EMBO Rep. 13, 709-715 (2012).

37

Shah, N. B. & Duncan, T. M. Organic layer interferometry to measure the kinetics of protein-protein interactions and results of the allosteric ligand. J. Vis. Exp. 84, e51383 (2014).

38

Teng, Y. et al. Analysis of metastases of most cancers cells in zebrafish. BMC Most cancers 13, 453 (2013).

39

Buenrostro, JD, Giresi, P., Zaba, L., Chang, H., Y. and Greenleaf, WJ Transposition of native chromatin for the institution of quick and delicate epigenomic profiles of open chromatin, binding to DNA and nucleosome place. Nat. Strategies 10, 1213-1218 (2013).

40

Ramírez, F. et al. deepTools2: a brand new era internet server for deep sequencing knowledge evaluation. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W160 to W165 (2016).

41

Zhu, L.J. et al. ChIPpeakAnno: a Bioconductor package deal to annotate ChIP-seq and ChIP-chip knowledge. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 237 (2010).

42

Heinz, S. et al. Easy combos of lineage-determining transcription elements optimize the cis-regulatory parts crucial for the identities of macrophages and B cells. Mol. Cell 38, 576-589 (2010).

43

Bailey, T. L. et al. EVEN MORE: instruments for discovery and sample search. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, W202 to W208 (2009).

44

Wilson, S. et al. Develop functions and laptop instruments for most cancers utilizing the NCI API genomic widespread knowledge. Most cancers Res. 77, e15 to e18 (2017).

45

Atlas community of the most cancers genome. Full molecular portraits of human mammary tumors. Nature 490, 61-70 (2012).

46

Cerami, E. et al. The cBio most cancers genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional knowledge on most cancers genomics. Most cancers Discov. 2, 401-404 (2012).

47

Wu, Y.-M. et al. Inactivation of CDK12 delimits a definite immunogenic class of superior prostate most cancers. Cell 173, 1770-1782 (2018).

48.

Cieslik, M. et al. Use of exome captured RNA for extremely degraded RNA with software to medical sequencing of most cancers. Genome Res. 25, 1372-1381 (2015).

49

Robinson, D.R. et al. Integrative medical genomics of metastatic most cancers. Nature 548, 297-303 (2017).

50

Layer, R.M., Chiang, C., Quinlan, A.R. and Corridor, I.M. LUMPY: A probabilistic framework for the invention of structural variants. Genome Biol. 15, R84 (2014).

51.

Liao, Y., Smyth, G. Ok. and Shi, W. FeatureCounts: An efficient basic function program for assigning sequence readings to genomic options. Bioinformatics 30, 923-930 (2013).

52.

Robinson, M.D., McCarthy, D.J. & Smyth, G.Ok. edgeR: a bioconductive software program package deal for the evaluation of differential expression of digital gene expression knowledge. Bioinformatics 26, 139-140 (2010).

53

Smyth, G.Ok., McCarthy, D.J. and Smyth, G.Ok. in Bioinformatics and computational biology options utilizing R and bioconductor (Eds Dudoit, S. & Carey, V.J.) 397-420 (Springer, New York, 2005).

54

Legislation, C. W., Chen, Y., Shi, W. and Smyth, G. Ok. voom: Precision Weights Unblock Linear Mannequin Evaluation Instruments for RNA-seq Reads Counts. Genome Biol. 15, R29 (2014).

55.

Liberzon, A. et al. The gathering of attribute gene units from the molecular signature database. Cell Syst. 1, 417-425 (2015).

56.

Newton, M., Quintana, F., Boon, J., D., Sengupta, S. and Ahlquist, P. Randomized strategies determine distinct features of the enrichment sign within the evaluation of units of genes. Ann. Appl. Stat. 1, 85-106 (2007).

57

Subramanian, A., Kuehn, H., Gould, P., Tamayo, P., and Mesirov, P., P., GSEA-P: An Workplace Software for Gene Set Enrichment Evaluation. Bioinformatics 23, 3251-3253 (2007).

58

Searle, S. et al. The set of GENCODE human genes. Genome Biol. 11, P36 (2010).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *